Skip to main content

d-cats.org

Bringing awareness and clarity on climate effects by the Tar/Oil Sands industry

Oil Sands Companies

Oil sands are a type of petroleum deposit, most of which are located in Alberta, Canada. Oil sands companies have secured Canada’s place in the global oil market; however, there has been much criticism for this method of extraction, as it is extremely damaging to the environment.

Example of a Suncor oil extraction site. Suncor is the largest of the oil sands companies.
Suncor oil extraction site.

Environmental Concerns

The target of oil sands reserves is bitumen, a dense form of crude oil which covers the sand. Extracting this bitumen from oil sands accounts for 8.5% of Canada’s total emissions, which is a considerable amount to consider when looking at reducing Canada’s emissions.

A barrel of oil emits 80% of its greenhouse gases during combustion by the individual using the oil. So, to make the largest impact, the government could provide the end user with more sustainable Canadian natural resources.

Oil Sands Production

The Alberta oil sands contributes to approximately 64% of Canadian oil exports, and has secured itself as a major contributor to Canada’s economy. This is equivalent to producing 2.9 million barrels per day, and over 1 billion barrels per year. Just five oil companies in Canada account for 82% of this production. The largest contributor is Suncor Energy, who’s carbon emissions have been increasing by around 10% per year.

Other large companies like Cenovus Energy and Athabasca Oil, have been scaling back projects this year due to the coronavirus outbreak. This is likely to take a toll on many oil companies, and it is predicted that Canadian oil stocks will continue to decline over the coming months. In fact, recent news shows oil prices have actually turned negative.

Future Projects

Further expansions to oil sands infrastructure continue to attract attention. Major oil pipelines for carrying crude oil from Canada’s tar sands region have been called into question over environmental concerns. The impact that a leak could have on the lakes that it would pass through would be disastrous for the ecosystem. This questioning shows that there is still hope for the scaling back of these oil and gas industries.

Oil sands companies account for a large amount of the oil used in our everyday lives. They are also a large source of carbon, and oil pipe leaks can damage huge areas of environmental importance. Therefore, the move away from these companies towards the use of sustainable natural resources is essential to protect the environment.

Spread the love

Shocking Oil Sands before and after

What are Oil Sands?

Oil sands are a natural mixture of sand, water, clay and a type of oil called bitumen. Due to their dark, sticky appearance, they’re often called “tar sands” – although it’s actually the bitumen that forms the thick, tar-like substance. These tar sands are seen as a gold mine for bitumen, but the extraction process is incredibly harmful to the planet. Experts criticise the water and air pollution that comes with sands operations, and the destruction of green space.

The role of Canada

Tar sands are located all over the world, but it’s Canada who have become the talking point for oil sands exploitation. The development of oil sands is a key booster of Alberta’s and Canada’s economy. Notably, Canadian oil sands deposits are some of the largest deposit sites of crude oil on the planet.

Alberta’s oil sand industry is booming in particular. There are four oil refineries in total in Alberta, with approximately 2.8 million barrels per day of synthetic oil made there. Suncor Energy Incorporated, the oldest mining company in the Canadian tar sands, produces 831,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day alone.

The shocking effects

Canada’s oil extraction process is extremely destructive to the environment. As much so, even, that according to a new government report1, Canada is warming twice as fast than the rest of the world. The Athabasca deposit is the most destructive deposit in Canada, situated north of Fort McMurray, Alberta. It’s also the most developed, using the most technologically advanced production processes.

oil sands before and after
Athabasca, before and after tar sands exploitation.
Photographer Unknown.

One of the world’s largest reserves of oil is under Canada’s boreal forest. There’s no actual oil, per se, to be extracted in these sites. It’s the sand itself that’s mined, and bitumen coats the grains of sand. Extracting this bitumen involves intense labouring. As a result, much of the forest is destroyed in the process.

boreal forest
Part of the boreal forest has been stripped away to reveal the bitumen-laced ground
Photo by Ian Willms

The boreal forest is gravely under threat. Industrial development and forest fires have destroyed almost two million acres of the forest since the year 2000. Alberta is responsible for 5.5% of this total land area, owing to the intensive mining operations.

Unfortunately, Canada’s Athabasca River hasn’t escaped unscathed either. The tailings ponds in Alberta’s tar sands region contain a toxic mixture of heavy metals and hydrocarbons. These toxins are prone to leaking into the Athabasca River. Shockingly, Alberta’s toxic tailings ponds are also so big that they can be seen from space.

Fort McMurray
A tailings pond at the Suncor tar sands development, near Fort McMurray, Alberta. Photo by Todd Korol

The future of Oil Sands

The International Energy Agency states that growth will begin to slow considerably in 2025, which is hopeful. Their research suggests that demand could fall to 67 million barrels of oil a day in 2040.

However, sadly, there is no reversing the colossal damage that mining has already caused. Where tar sands exploitation grows, acres of green land become lost, and millions of tons of CO2 is released into the atmosphere. The before and after photographs of oil sands are haunting – and they speak volumes for the impact on our planet.

References

  1. Canada’s ChangingClimate Report, 2019
Spread the love

Everything You Need to Know About Fossil Fuel Power

Fossil fuel is a natural resource of power made from the remains of dead plants and animals. It is a major source of global energy and gives us the ability to power our daily lives. However, whilst utilizing fossil fuel energy is useful, it is a mass contributor to climate change.

What is fossil fuel power?

Fossil fuel energy includes a large list of different sources that can used as power. In energy statistics1, coal, manufactured gases, peat, shale and oil sands, oil and natural gases all considered part of this group.

Major fossil fuel industries profit from producing and selling these as products on a global scale. Examples include the likes of BP in the United States2 who dominate the petroleum industry. The economic stance is one that businesses and politicians sometimes take.

For example, at the 2014 Canada Europe Energy Summit3, the UK’s Energy Minister Matt Hancock commented on fossil fuels. He said4, “Our aim is to maximise economic recovery of our hydrocarbon reserves, to boost growth, energy security, and jobs.”

Fossil fuel companies have come under criticism for their stance and impact on climate change. Since 1965, 20 companies have contributed to 35% of all energy-related carbon dioxide and methane worldwide5. This hasn’t gone unnoticed as many protest against them.

Carbon emissions and climate change

Scientists recognise that the burning of fossil fuels over last century has increased the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide. Estimates suggest that roughly 80% of all manmade carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions originate from fossil fuels combustion.

The IPCC recognises6 that fossil fuel emissions must be halved by 2030 if we are to achieve targets of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees. However, research by the UN Environment Programme shows we are not on track to meet this. More needs to be done to divest and move away from fossil fuel power. Renewables present an alternative.

Are there alternatives to fossil fuel power?

As a result of our fossil fuel use over the last century and the environmental impact it has had, there is a need for alternatives. We can’t continue on the same path and expect to meet our climate change goals. Furthermore, fossil fuel resources will run out as they are finite.

Renewable energy systems are a possible alternative as they have a limited negative environmental impact compared to fossil fuel power. Examples include wind, solar power, biomass, hydroelectricity, and geothermal.

Some research says renewables aren’t ready, but others are more optimistic7. Predictions suggest the solar surge will come at the cost of coal, currently the largest fossil fuel source of carbon emissions. There are also suggestions that electric production will curb the demand for oil. Yet whilst there are drawbacks, renewables are a way of moving away from fossil fuel power.

References

  1. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:Fossil_fuel
  2. https://www.bp.com/en_us/united-states/home/who-we-are/bp-in-the-us.html
  3. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/speech-at-the-europe-canada-energy-summit
  4. https://www.carbonbrief.org/tackling-climate-while-maximising-oil-extraction-uk-canada-meeting-glosses-the-paradox
  5. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions
  6. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
  7. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/12/global-energy-demand-will-keep-world-burning-fossil-fuels-agency-says.html

Spread the love

Key things you should know about these new oil sands projects

Current fossil fuel production levels are not in line with goals outlined by the IPCC, according to research. One of the keys to this is the role of new oil sands projects. They sit uneasily with 1.5 degrees goals1 widely agreed upon at COP summit meetings.

The extraction of oil sand is one of the lesser-known fossil fuel industries, but nonetheless it is still controversial. It results in the production of oil from the extraction of reserves.

Where are the proposed new oil sands projects?

Frontier mine, Alberta Canada. The site is a staggering 292 square kilometers covering 24,000-hectares2. Its capabilities mean it could produce 260,000 barrels of bitumen each day at its peak. As a result, potential development would make it one of the largest ever built in Alberta.

Canada has long had a history of oil production. The country is the fourth-largest producer and exporter of oil in the world. This makes its oil reserves an economic incentive with 96% of Canada’s proven oil located in the oil sands3. However, any new plans would be another step in the wrong direction for the environment.

Why are the new oil sands projects controversial?

Firstly, the environmental impact of the oil sand industry is huge. The Frontier mine oil sand project would be entirely incompatible with climate change goals. Research suggests it would produce 6 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions per year until 20674. This is a gargantuan amount. Nevertheless, it is not dissimilar to many other previous Canadian oil sands projects in its environmental impact.

Secondly, a vast amount of energy is needed to create space for the mine as 3,000 hectares of old-growth forest would need to be cut down5. As a carbon sink, this has a further impact on climate change.

What are current plans?

Teck Resources Ltd. are pulling its application for a new oil sands project in Alberta6. This has removed Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau from making a critical decision on the future of Alberta. Should it have remained, Trudeau would need to consider Canada’s goal of carbon neutrality by 2050.

What else do I need to know?

Canada has had a strong history with oil sand projects due to its rich reserves. However, the Frontier mine project does not appear to have a long lifetime at just 41 years7, as future oil demand remains in question. This perhaps contributed to Teck Resources Ltd.’s own uncertainty about the economic sense of the project, alongside more global concerns.

References

  1. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
  2. https://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/story/28683/behind-the-headlines-5-need-to-know-facts-about-the-teck-frontier-mine/
  3. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energy-data-analysis/energy-facts/crude-oil-facts/20064
  4. https://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/story/28683/behind-the-headlines-5-need-to-know-facts-about-the-teck-frontier-mine/
  5. https://thenarwhal.ca/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-massive-new-oilsands-mine-that-just-got-a-green-light/
  6. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-24/teck-pulls-application-for-oil-sands-mine-in-relief-for-trudeau
  7. https://thenarwhal.ca/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-massive-new-oilsands-mine-that-just-got-a-green-light/
Spread the love

What is the most abundant fossil fuel?

Despite the clear need for us to transition to green energy, fossil fuels still dominate our energy markets. But what is our planet’s most abundant fossil fuel?

The Most Abundant Fossil Fuel Crown Goes to…Coal

Nations like Saudi Arabia have major oil fields, while Russia leads the pack on proven natural gas resources.

But, taking the planet as a whole, the most abundant fossil fuel is coal.

The United States has the largest coal sources of any nation. States like Wyoming and Virginia have made coal mining a way of life. In fact, the United States government boasts its coal reserves total one quarter of the world’s proven coal sources.

To put that another way, the United States has more coal than the rest of the world has available oil reserves.

There’s a big problem though. For the past few years the United States government has tried to revive its coal industry, but it hasn’t worked.

For one thing, the American public doesn’t want more coal mining operations. Another issue is that natural gas and other fossil fuels are out-competing coal. The growing green energy sector is also applying pressure.

So, it’s little wonder that the global coal market has been in free-fall. Despite the United States seeing a brief surge in coal export demand around 2017, this downward spiral does not look set to end.

Fossil Fuels Infrastructure: An Increasingly Risky Bet

Coal is notorious for being a “dirty” fossil fuel, and with good reason.

The mining process is an ugly one that carves up massive amounts of earth and can also change water courses. Acid mine drainage is also an environmental concern that requires long-term management.

Now, the United States has started to transition to natural gas production. Nations like the UK through to Japan are also following. They bill this as a “clean” energy alternative.

However, environmental groups say while natural gas might seem attractive, it is anything but environmentally friendly and has several of the same problems as coal.

Many gas drilling sites cannot be the same as the sites we have used for oil and coal extraction. This means we are having to clear yet more new land and build new infrastructure to feed our fossil fuel habit.

What’s more, some gas extraction processes use a lot of water. With that comes the risk of water contamination. This happened in Wyoming where research shows fracking led to ground water contamination.

Environmentalists worry that investment in natural gas infrastructure now will only prolong fossil fuel use in the future, and we can’t afford that.

If we are to have any hope of achieving our climate change related targets, scientists are clear that fossil fuels cannot be part of our long term strategy.

It is time to leave fossil fuels alone, whether that is coal, oil or natural gas, and whether they are abundant energy sources or not.

Spread the love

Some of the issues

Interview with WDIV, Channel 4 at the human blockade action on Monday, June 24 2013 at TransFlo Terminal.

The topics covered in the video were:

  • Illegal dumping has been happening since November 2012 to present. Triggered by Marathon Refinery’s installation of a new delay coker.
  • Koch Carbon has been purchasing the petroleum coke as soon as it comes out of the coker. This is why Marathon states they have no claim to the material.
  • The petcoke run is a continual flow of trucks from the refinery. About every 15 minutes another truck arrives with more for the piles.
  • Fugitive dust is created when the load is dropped in the yard, then more dust when the loader picks up each shovel full, and more dust when it is sent on a conveyor to the top of the piles.
  • Conveyors are able to stack the petcoke up to 50 feet in the air.
  • Tuesday June 18 MDEQ stated during Public Health & Safety meeting of City Council that they recommended to Detroit Bulk Storage and its operations that piles were to be kept under 20 feet high. The piles are 40-50 feet high a week later.
  • The filing of a conditional use permit is happening after-the-fact. It should have been filed before the site’s use for the product before November 2012.
  • Detroit Bulk Storage Company is violating the law. They have not filed for conditional use, they have ignored requests to comply, they have been ticketed only once, on June 5th before the PH&S meeting that date.
  • We are demanding the illegal actions of Detroit Bulk Storage Company are prosecuted. Some corporate representatives need to be put in jail for their crimes against the environment and the people.
  • We demand Koch Carbon creates a community health fund to handle the long term health effects of the environmental conditions created.
  • The Riverwalk expansion will offer more tax collection and job creation than this industrial dumping site.
  • Fishermen likely missed seeing the black plume of petcoke in the stormwater drains. Detroit Bulk Storage cemented a stormwater catch on June 5th, however water finds a way to go where it wishes.
  • Windsor has reported petcoke dust on their streets which is going into their stormwater catches as well.

Spread the love